Foreword. Data Artifact: the machine-readable twin of VRS-AER-201 (VRS 2026 (draft)) — the sector criteria with their point ranges, rungs and tier ceilings, the contributing intrinsic criteria, the letter bands and the application classes — generated FROM the protocol’s Clause 5–7 by
tools/vrs-twin-generate.py. Consistency is by construction and re-verified on every build (conformance check 15). The JSON in Clause 4 is the normative payload; scorer tooling consumes it directly. A change to VRS-AER-201 and to this twin is one change instrument.
1 Scope
This Data Artifact carries the rubric data of the Aerial / UAS (AER) sector in machine-readable form: the 9 sector criteria of VRS-AER-201 Clause 6 with points, rungs and Unverified / Verified / Certified ceilings; the contributing intrinsic criteria of Clause 5; the letter bands and application classes of Clause 7. It states no independent requirements. Where this artifact and VRS-AER-201 could be read to differ, VRS-AER-201 governs and this twin is regenerated to match.
2 Normative references
- VRS-AER-201, Aerial / UAS — AR Assessment Protocol — source protocol twinned (Clauses 5–7).
- VRS-AER-001, Aerial / UAS — Sector Standard — application classes and hazard groups.
- VRS-GEN-005, IR Methodology — point sum, tier ceilings, no-evidence rule.
- VRS-GEN-006, AR Scheme — pool mechanics, letter bands, tier caps by construction.
- VRS-GEN-002, Designation and Drafting Rules — criterion layout (§6.5) and versioning.
3 Terms and definitions
The terms of VRS-GEN-001 and VRS-AER-201 apply. data twin — a machine-readable artifact regenerated one-to-one from a source protocol’s normative clauses. rung — a named state of a criterion awarding a stated integer number of points (VRS-GEN-002 §3.9). ceiling — the maximum points a criterion awards at a stated tier (VRS-GEN-002 §3.10).
4 Payload
Sector criteria total 100 points; ceilings Unverified 70, Verified 85, Certified 100.
{
"_meta": {
"description": "AER sector AR rubric data twin — machine-readable form of VRS-AER-201 Clause 5/6/7 (VRS 2026 (draft)). Generated by tools/vrs-twin-generate.py; never hand-edited.",
"edition": "VRS 2026 (draft)",
"source_protocol": "VRS-AER-201 v1.0.0",
"generated": "2026-09-16",
"conforms_to": "VRS-GEN-005 §6 (point sum, tier ceilings); VRS-GEN-006 §6–§8 (pool, bands, tier caps by construction)"
},
"sector_code": "aer",
"bands_percent": {
"AAA": 90,
"AA": 75,
"A": 60,
"B": 45,
"C": 0
},
"application_classes": [
"small UAS (< 25 kg)",
"heavy-lift / delivery",
"dock-based autonomous",
"VTOL fixed-wing"
],
"contributing_ir_criteria": [
{
"id": "SF-2",
"document": "VRS-GEN-101",
"clause": "6.2"
},
{
"id": "SF-5",
"document": "VRS-GEN-101",
"clause": "6.5"
},
{
"id": "SF-7",
"document": "VRS-GEN-101",
"clause": "6.7"
},
{
"id": "SF-8",
"document": "VRS-GEN-101",
"clause": "6.8"
},
{
"id": "RL-1",
"document": "VRS-GEN-102",
"clause": "6.1"
},
{
"id": "RL-2",
"document": "VRS-GEN-102",
"clause": "6.2"
},
{
"id": "RL-7",
"document": "VRS-GEN-102",
"clause": "6.7"
},
{
"id": "SV-1",
"document": "VRS-GEN-103",
"clause": "6.1"
},
{
"id": "SV-5",
"document": "VRS-GEN-103",
"clause": "6.5"
},
{
"id": "CY-3",
"document": "VRS-GEN-105",
"clause": "6.3"
},
{
"id": "CY-4",
"document": "VRS-GEN-105",
"clause": "6.4"
},
{
"id": "CY-5",
"document": "VRS-GEN-105",
"clause": "6.5"
},
{
"id": "MS-1",
"document": "VRS-GEN-106",
"clause": "6.1"
},
{
"id": "MS-7",
"document": "VRS-GEN-106",
"clause": "6.7"
},
{
"id": "SI-1",
"document": "VRS-GEN-104",
"clause": "6.1"
},
{
"id": "SI-2",
"document": "VRS-GEN-104",
"clause": "6.2"
},
{
"id": "SI-6",
"document": "VRS-GEN-104",
"clause": "6.5"
}
],
"sector_criteria": [
{
"clause": "6.1",
"id": "AER-1",
"name": "Airworthiness / class-mark / operational-authorisation fit",
"points_max": 14,
"what_is_measured": ".",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 14,
"state": "class mark or type approval by notified body/authority + operational authorisations published"
},
{
"points": 13,
"state": "pack-evidenced (documents), not demonstrated"
},
{
"points": 12,
"state": "class mark/approval public"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "declared conformity with test reports"
},
{
"points": 4,
"state": "declared"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 12,
"verified": 13,
"certified": 14
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Class and operating category declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.2",
"id": "AER-2",
"name": "Lost-link and fail-safe behaviour",
"points_max": 14,
"what_is_measured": "C2 loss → declared RTH/land/loiter; GNSS-degraded fallback.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 14,
"state": "witnessed incl. GNSS-degraded"
},
{
"points": 11,
"state": "pack-evidenced (documents), not demonstrated"
},
{
"points": 10,
"state": "witnessed nominal"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "certified/independently tested"
},
{
"points": 5,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 8,
"verified": 11,
"certified": 14
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Fail-safe behaviours declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.3",
"id": "AER-3",
"name": "Airspace containment (geo-awareness, altitude/area limits, Remote ID)",
"points_max": 12,
"what_is_measured": ".",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 12,
"state": "witnessed refusal at boundary + Remote ID broadcast verified"
},
{
"points": 10,
"state": "pack-evidenced (documents), not demonstrated"
},
{
"points": 9,
"state": "documented + certified"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "publicly evidenced only (no pack, no demonstration)"
},
{
"points": 6,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 8,
"verified": 10,
"certified": 12
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Geo-awareness declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.4",
"id": "AER-4",
"name": "Ground-risk mitigation",
"points_max": 12,
"what_is_measured": "Parachute/flight-termination, over-people class limits, impact-energy statements.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 12,
"state": "witnessed termination/parachute + certified"
},
{
"points": 10,
"state": "pack-evidenced (documents), not demonstrated"
},
{
"points": 9,
"state": "certified ((public))"
},
{
"points": 6,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 6,
"verified": 10,
"certified": 12
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Ground-risk mitigations declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.5",
"id": "AER-5",
"name": "Propulsion and battery in-flight integrity",
"points_max": 12,
"what_is_measured": "Redundancy, battery health management, low-battery behaviour, thermal limits.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 12,
"state": "witnessed low-battery + motor-out behaviour"
},
{
"points": 9,
"state": "validated"
},
{
"points": 7,
"state": "publicly evidenced only (no pack, no demonstration)"
},
{
"points": 5,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 7,
"verified": 9,
"certified": 12
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Battery/propulsion architecture declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.6",
"id": "AER-6",
"name": "Weather-envelope discipline",
"points_max": 6,
"what_is_measured": "Wind/precip/icing limits published; app warnings; launch refusal beyond limits.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 6,
"state": "witnessed refusal"
},
{
"points": 5,
"state": "documented + independently tested"
},
{
"points": 4,
"state": "publicly evidenced only (no pack, no demonstration)"
},
{
"points": 3,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 4,
"verified": 5,
"certified": 6
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "Weather envelope declared.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.7",
"id": "AER-7",
"name": "Maintenance, inspection and fleet-firmware discipline",
"points_max": 10,
"what_is_measured": "Published maintenance programme with intervals; per-airframe logs; fleet firmware management.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 10,
"state": "all shown"
},
{
"points": 9,
"state": "documented in detail (public programme)"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "publicly evidenced only (no pack, no demonstration)"
},
{
"points": 5,
"state": "partial"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 8,
"verified": 9,
"certified": 10
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "None.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.8",
"id": "AER-8",
"name": "Occurrence and incident record",
"points_max": 10,
"what_is_measured": "Authority occurrence databases over the window, normalised by disclosed fleet/flight hours.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 10,
"state": "none attributable to the model"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "company-wide record in place of model-specific data"
},
{
"points": 7,
"state": "remediated"
},
{
"points": 3,
"state": "null-result rung"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established. · 0. Regime-full at Unverified"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 10,
"verified": 10,
"certified": 10
},
"company_wide": {
"text": "Company-wide → 8",
"ceiling": 8
},
"evidence_bar": "None.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
},
{
"clause": "6.9",
"id": "AER-9",
"name": "C2-link and data security",
"points_max": 10,
"what_is_measured": "Encrypted C2 and video, local-data mode, account/remote controls, spoofing resistance.",
"rungs": [
{
"points": 10,
"state": "shown + third-party audit"
},
{
"points": 8,
"state": "documented in detail + audit"
},
{
"points": 7,
"state": "publicly evidenced only (no pack, no demonstration)"
},
{
"points": 5,
"state": "documented"
},
{
"points": 0,
"state": "not established"
}
],
"ceiling": {
"unverified": 7,
"verified": 8,
"certified": 10
},
"company_wide": null,
"evidence_bar": "None.",
"applicability": "small UAS (< 25 kg) · heavy-lift / delivery · dock-based autonomous · VTOL fixed-wing. All criteria apply to all classes.",
"not_applicable_by_class": false
}
],
"pool": {
"sector_only": {
"points": 100,
"ceiling_unverified": 70,
"ceiling_verified": 85,
"ceiling_certified": 100,
"best_letter": {
"unverified": "A",
"verified": "AA",
"certified": "AAA"
}
},
"with_contributors": "contributor ceilings are those of the cited IR standards; the combined pool sums are verified by the conformance gate (check 14)"
},
"rules": {
"no_evidence": "0 points (VRS-GEN-005 §6, R3.3); the criterion stays in the pool at full range",
"not_applicable": "criterion removed from numerator and denominator for that class (VRS-GEN-006 §6)",
"tier_rule": "AR tier ≤ IR tier (VRS-GEN-006 §7)"
}
}
5 Field dictionary
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
sector_criteria[].clause |
VRS-AER-201 subclause (6.k) — the “Required by” reference used in derived packs and protocols |
sector_criteria[].points_max |
Upper end of the criterion’s integer range |
sector_criteria[].rungs[] |
Every verifiable state and its points, highest first; the 0 state is implicit where not listed |
sector_criteria[].ceiling |
Maximum points at each tier; always equal to a rung value (VRS-GEN-002 §7.5.1) |
sector_criteria[].company_wide |
Field-record criteria only: the reduced ceiling when company-wide data substitutes for model data |
sector_criteria[].applicability / not_applicable_by_class |
Application classes the criterion applies to; excluded criteria leave the pool for that class |
contributing_ir_criteria[] |
Intrinsic criteria counted in the sector pool, with the standard and clause that score them |
pool.sector_only |
Sums over the sector criteria and the best attainable letter at each tier (A / AA / AAA by construction) |
bands_percent |
Letter thresholds as a percentage of the applicable pool (VRS-GEN-006 §4) |
6 Verification
Regenerate with python3 tools/vrs-twin-generate.py --sector aer --check; a non-zero exit means the
committed twin no longer matches VRS-AER-201 and shall be regenerated before publication.
Bibliography
- VRS-AER-201, Aerial / UAS — AR Assessment Protocol, v1.0.0, 2026 — the source of every number in Clause 4.
- VRS-AER-001, AER Sector Standard, 2026 — sector scope, hazard taxonomy and application classes.
- VRS-GEN-005, Intrinsic Rating — Methodology, 2026 — point aggregation and tier ceilings for the contributing IR criteria.
- VRS-GEN-006, Application Rating Scheme, 2026 — letter bands and pool mechanics reproduced in
bands_percentandpool. - VRS-GEN-002, Designation and Drafting Rules, 2026 — §6.5 criterion layout and §7.5.1 (ceilings equal rungs) that this twin verifies.
- VRS-GEN-004, Change, Edition and Review Policy, 2026 — how a twin regeneration is designated.
- VRS-GEN-009, Robot Risk Passport and Registry — Data Schema, 2026 — consumer of the payload.
- ISO/IEC 21778:2017, Information technology — The JSON data interchange syntax.
Change history
| Version | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 (draft) | 2026-09-16 | VRS 2026 (draft) rewrite: regenerated from VRS-AER-201 Clause 5–7 (criteria, rungs, tier ceilings, contributors, bands, classes). Weights, modifiers, confidence and stage-prior fields removed. |